12Sep 2015
Sep 12, 2015

Judge denies city motion on funding Sheriff Dept

While in court, the City of Thomaston raised concerns in regards to the motion for declaratory judgment and injunction relief under the Service Delivery Strategy Act. The concerns were weather Thomaston residents have to pay for law enforcement services that the Sheriff’s Department was not providing.

Unfortunately for the city, on August 24 Senior Superior Court Judge Stephen E. Boswell denied the city’s motion, he ruled that the sheriff was independent from the county according to the Constitution of the State of Georgia. The sheriff is an elected constitutional officer and not an employee of the county commission, therefore he is subject to charge of the General Assembly, stated the Supreme Court of Georgia. According to the state law, the sheriff is responsible for keeping the peace within the county, including the unincorporated portions of Upson County and incorporated areas like Thomaston and Yatesville.

The issue raised by the city was the Sheriff’s Department being funded through the general fund of Upson County, which is supported by Thomaston taxpayers. The city’s residents are in favor of the sheriff’s department being funded through the Service Delivery Strategy Act. Under the act, the unincorporated county is set up as a special taxing district and the city as a special taxing district. As a result the city’s residents will not have to pay for portions of the Sheriff’s Departments’ duties that are not provided to city residents.

Looking at an illustration of the city’s claims, in the last fiscal year, the Sheriff’s Department budget that was allocated to the Narcotics Task Force, patrol and investigations was approximately $1,436,152.25. Based on the 35.66 percent that city residents contributed to joint projects in 2014. The city’s portion to that was $512,131.

According to Andrew Pippen, Criminal Investigations Division Commander for the Thomaston Police Department, from 2012 to 2014 the Upson County Sheriff’s Department only did one investigation within the City of Thomaston. In addition, the city also indicated that in a deposition of Sheriff Kilgore, he acknowledged that it was difficult to police the city with his existing budget.

The city residents feel that they should not contribute the $512,131 to the Sheriff’s Department through taxes paid into the county’s general fund because Thomaston has its own police force responsible for investigations and patrol, and has its own Narcotics Task Force.

Moreover, since Georgia Code states that the county cannot use its general funds to pay for services offered essentially for the benefit of unincorporated areas, the city residents were in favor of the funding for the Sheriff’s Department to be handled through the Service Delivery Strategy Act, which necessitates the county and the city to set up special taxing districts. The benefits being that the county will be in a position to collect part of the Sheriff’s Department budget through the taxing district set up in the unincorporated portion of the county.

However, while ruling on the case Judge Boswell used a 2005 opinion given by then-Georgia Attorney General Thurbert Baker, he also referred to the Georgia Constitution; as a result the ruling was not in favor of the City of Thomaston residents. Nevertheless, Thomaston City Attorney Joel Bentley was not impressed with the ruling and has indicated that the city is planning to appeal Judge Bosworth’s decision.

18 responses on “Judge denies city motion on funding Sheriff Dept

  1. maillog says:

    I don’t usually read blog postings, but after reading this one, I had no choice but to try. Your writing style astounded me greatly. I appreciate your wonderful post.

  2. I do not even know how I ended up here but I thought this post was great I do not know who you are but certainly youre going to a famous blogger if you are not already Cheers

  3. I do not even know how I ended up here but I thought this post was great I dont know who you are but definitely youre going to a famous blogger if you arent already Cheers

  4. puravive says:

    Of course, I like your website, but several of your pieces need to have their spelling checked. Several of them contain multiple spelling mistakes, which makes it challenging for me to be honest. Still, I will most certainly return.

  5. I really like reading through a post that can make men and women think. Also, thank you for allowing me to comment!

  6. Can you be more specific about the content of your article? After reading it, I still have some doubts. Hope you can help me. https://accounts.binance.com/bg/register-person?ref=IQY5TET4

  7. Thanks I have just been looking for information about this subject for a long time and yours is the best Ive discovered till now However what in regards to the bottom line Are you certain in regards to the supply

  8. certainly like your website but you need to take a look at the spelling on quite a few of your posts. Many of them are rife with spelling problems and I find it very troublesome to inform the reality nevertheless I will definitely come back again.

  9. Your posts always provide me with a new perspective and encourage me to look at things differently Thank you for broadening my horizons

  10. puravive says:

    Your posts always provide me with a new perspective and encourage me to look at things differently Thank you for broadening my horizons

  11. alpilean says:

    Your posts always provide me with a new perspective and encourage me to look at things differently Thank you for broadening my horizons

  12. I loved as much as you will receive carried out right here The sketch is tasteful your authored subject matter stylish nonetheless you command get got an edginess over that you wish be delivering the following unwell unquestionably come further formerly again as exactly the same nearly very often inside case you shield this hike

  13. Your posts always provide me with a new perspective and encourage me to look at things differently Thank you for broadening my horizons

  14. Thanks for sharing. I read many of your blog posts, cool, your blog is very good.

  15. I don’t think the title of your article matches the content lol. Just kidding, mainly because I had some doubts after reading the article.

  16. Simply desire to say your article is as surprising The clearness in your post is simply excellent and i could assume you are an expert on this subject Fine with your permission let me to grab your feed to keep up to date with forthcoming post Thanks a million and please carry on the gratifying work

  17. khaleejuae says:

    What i do not understood is in truth how you are not actually a lot more smartlyliked than you may be now You are very intelligent You realize therefore significantly in the case of this topic produced me individually imagine it from numerous numerous angles Its like men and women dont seem to be fascinated until it is one thing to do with Woman gaga Your own stuffs nice All the time care for it up

  18. This website is truly amazing! It’s packed with valuable information. I’m passing it along to my friends and also bookmarking it. Of course, a big thank you for all your hard work! Keep it up! By the way I am a Senior Researcher @ Clickmen™ ~ SEO Experts & Backlink Building Web Design Agency in USA & Canada.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *